Home Table of Contents
Previous Chapter Next Chapter
Chapter 18
Should the federal government increase the debt or savings it is carrying,
keep it at the current amount, or reduce it?
Aside from its representing the sacrifice of the future for the
present—including our children’s future!—the main objection to government debt is that everyone’s hard-earned tax money goes into the pockets of the rich both here and abroad in the form of interest
paid on the debt rather than into useful actions.
This may very well be part of the reason why the national debt is
never paid off. The wealthy own and populate government and serve themselves
well by maintaining a perpetual national debt. What a scam! First they create a
tax system so full of loopholes and evasions for themselves that what should and
is claimed to be a progressive tax, taxing the rich at a higher rate than the
middle class and the working poor, is turned instead into a regressive tax,
effectively taxing the middle class and the poor at a higher rate than the rich.
Then, when the government disburses and expends the collected tax revenue, the
wealthy take a huge cut off the top in the form of enormous amounts of interest
paid on the national debt. Further, by the time the wealthy fill their pockets
with lucrative government contracts and all of the upper classes participating
in government take home their pay and perks little real money reaches the truly
poor. Therefore, the disbursements and expenditures of our tax dollars by
government are also regressive in that they benefit the wealthy more than the
poor. This is all, of course, to be expected of our American plutocracy.
The huge national debt that our nation has been
accumulating ever more rapidly from the Reagan administration to this day
increasingly diminishes our government’s ability to accomplish anything with
collected tax revenue and our ability to effectively compete in the world’s
economy. It even threatens our nation’s very solvency.
The rationale for including the national debt issue within the demos is
to force congress to stop spending money it doesn’t have and to give
all of us the opportunity to stop handing the rich our tax money in the form of interest on the
debt by eliminating the debt. Of course, the possibility
exists that an undisciplined demos might increase the national debt. But at least then we
could point the finger at no one but
ourselves.
It is simply foolish to carry debt. Yes, our screwy tax system can
and does make debt a ‘rational’ choice for business and individuals, but 1) that tax system ought not
exist and 2) even with all of the tricks that one can play, debt is more often than not the road to
economic imprisonment and financial ruin. That our leaders in government have long held our nation in a permanent state of debt and
have almost overnight thrown it into the position of being the world’s greatest debtor nation
is sheer insanity. And now our government is at the brink of financial collapse.
At the very least we can expect high inflation and declining living standards.
This demos issue is stated: Should the federal government increase
the debt
or savings it is carrying, keep it at
the current amount, or reduce it? If it were operated in a rational manner, government would not carry debt but an enormous amount of savings. The government
embodies all of us, or at least it should. Its savings is our savings. We as a nation, via the federal government, should have
enormous savings on hand that we lend out to earn interest. The interest should be used
to fund part of the government’s annual operating expenses. This would allow a decrease in the amount of money it would need to acquire each year via taxation.
Government savings would also provide the resources for the budget buffers
described in the previous chapter. And savings would provide the funds needed to help the nation
through emergencies such as natural disasters.
At any rate, along with the word debt
the word savings is included in this demos issue as a wishful thought.
This issue’s demos page would be of the three button style with an up arrow for
“Increase
the debt or savings,” below that a square or rectangle for “Keep at the current amount of
debt or savings,” and below that a downward-pointing arrow for “Decrease the debt or savings.”
Home
Table of Contents Previous Chapter
Next Chapter Top of Page
Beyond Plutocracy - Direct Democracy for America
www.BeyondPlutocracy.com
© Copyright 2001-2017 Roger D Rothenberger
|